The Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) measures emotional intelligence through an individual's abilities to perceive, comprehend, act on, and manage emotional information.

Intrapersonal competencies

Ages 17 to adult

Student

Paper/Pencil, Digital

141

Likert-type scale

Approximately 30-45 minutes Gb instruments gvd-505a user manual.

Over 20 languages, including German, English, Dutch, French, Mandarin Chinese, Arabic, and Spanish

Qualification Level B

An overall emotional intelligence score is reported.

Several subscores are reported. These are organized hierarchically as area scores, branch scores, and individual task scores:

• Experiential Emotional Intelligence
  • Perceiving Emotion
    • Faces
    • Pictures
  • Facilitating Thought
    • Sensations
    • Facilitation
• Strategic Emotional Intelligence
  • Understanding Emotion
    • Blends
    • Changes
  • Managing Emotion
    • Emotion Management
    • Emotional Relations

MSCEIT is scored using a scoring service.

Scores are normed and scaled for comparison.

Thus, for safety and other reasons, it is a good idea to verifyinformation here to make sure it matches up with your boat.

2,112 adult respondents (18+)

Overall score reliabilities (split half coefficients) reported to be greater than 0.90. The internal consistency reliability of the four branch scores ranged from 0.76 to 0.91 (Mayer, Salovey, Caruso & Sitarenios, 2003).

Test-retest reliability for the overall score was reported as 0.86 (Brackett & Mayer, 2001).

Evidence based on content

Items were designed to align with a four-branch ability theory of emotional intelligence. The MSCEIT has been developed and refined based on more than a decade of study and research on emotional intelligence (Mayer, Salovery, & Caruso, 2004).

Evidence based on response processes

No information is available in the references reviewed.

Evidence based on internal structure

Factor analysis supports one, two, and four factor solutions (corresponding to the overall score, area score, and branch scores) (Mayer, Salovey, Caruso & Sitarenios, 2003).

Evidence based on relations with other variables

The relationship between MSCEIT scores and scores on the Big Five personality test showed that people who scored high on the MSCEIT also scored were more likely to be agreeable (r = 0.21), open (r = 0.17), and conscientious (r = 0.11). People who scored higher on the branch of using emotions of the MSCEIT were more likely to choose jobs to help others. People who were good at understanding emotions were more likely to choose adaptive defense mechanism, such as sublimation, instead of less adaptive mechanism, such as denial (Mayer, Salovery, & Caruso, 2004).

In terms of how well MSCEIT scores predict students’ academic performance, the correlation between MSCEIT scores and college students' grades ranged between 0.20 and 0.25. However, this correlation became trivial after the general intelligence was controlled in the analysis.

In addition, MSCEIT scores showed a consistent negative relationship and deviancy and problem behaviors such as bullying, violence, tobacco use, and drug problem, even after the effects of general intelligence and personality were statistically controlled for. MSCEIT scores on emotional management were also positively significantly related with the quality of relationship with friends. However, results on the relationship between MSCEIT scores and leadership were mixed, for which Mayer, Salovey, and Caruso (2004) attributed to differences in the demand for the ability to maintain a good relationship with colleagues and customers among different careers examined.